Heckler (2007)
This movie pulls a bait and switch and it is really too bad. When the documentary starts it is fast and funny before turning into a very sad therapy session and then a tasteless mess. I really really enjoyed the first part though. When ‘Heckler’ actually deals with the act of heckling it provides a fascinating look into comedic performers, their philosophies and their quick tempers.
Many comedians hate hecklers, with vicious language and fire in their eyes. There are clips provided of how different comedians handle heckling. The great ones seem to turn it around, to light up at the chance to battle with words. These people, I thought to myself, really get it. The act of standing in front of a dark room of people and trying to make them laugh is so bold and brave, and self absorbed too, that ‘only’ being heckled should probably be seen as a gift.
The film’s host is Jamie Kennedy, a silly actor and comedian who I generally do not have any strong feelings for, and he doth protest too much. Kennedy made this film, with director Michael Addis, to find out why his terrible film ‘The Son of The Mask’ was so poorly received. This is when the movie loses itself completely.
The mask comes off (or goes on?). ’Heckler’ becomes anger therapy for sad clowns. Famous, and ex-famous, faces pop in and out to talk about how unfair it is to criticize them. How all they do is work hard to try and make people laugh. How all they need is a little positive reinforcement. It is unbelievably annoying for a great bit of the film.
Bill Maher says at one point “You can’t be thick skinned. You have to be sensitive to do this.” I wish the movie had dove deeper into that concept. Hell, I wish the movie had stuck with the heckler theme. Those stories where often hilarious and provided a unique look into human nature from the stage, instead of at it.
The movie ends on quite a sour note. Kennedy, after multiple scenes of confronting critics, both professional movie critics and audience members, about why they think he sucks, gives a mea culpa of sorts. He says how he appreciates the critics but it comes across as indulgent and dumb. This sense is only exacerbated by the fat jokes and failed meta-ness that follows. He invites viewers to dismiss something that started so full of humor and promise.


